Skip to content
Request a quote

Deflection limits

The strength check answers whether the structure carries the load. The serviceability check answers whether its behaviour is acceptable: that it does not deflect too far, vibrate annoyingly or crack the finish.

The two are separate, and in a thin-walled structure the second is often the stricter.

A rigid finish — ceramic tiling, thin render, rigid boards — tolerates little movement. Where such a finish goes on the structure, the limit has to be stricter.

Too flexible a lintel presses on the window or door frame and makes it stick.

A visibly sagging floor or a wall that “lives” in the wind is unpleasant even when it is structurally sound.

On a flat roof, deflection can cause ponding, which comes back on the roof covering.

Where it counts especially in a thin-walled structure

Section titled “Where it counts especially in a thin-walled structure”

An external wall deflects under wind pressure. If the finish is rigid, the permitted movement is small — often more onerous than the strength check.

Here vibration enters alongside deflection. Floor vibration.

Strict limits even over short spans, because of the window or door.

  • The limit is chosen to suit the role of the structure, not applied uniformly.
  • Long-term and short-term effects are treated separately.
  • The sensitivity of the finish is settled up front: if the finish will be rigid, the structural engineer has to know.

That last point is a common source of misunderstanding: the build-up decision feeds back into the structure, so it cannot be made after the structure is closed.

The most effective way to reduce deflection is to increase stiffness: a deeper section, closer spacing, a shorter span. Increasing the material thickness is less effective — that improves the capacity instead.

A structure is good when it not only carries the load but moves in a way nobody notices. The serviceability limits are set by the sensitivity of the finish — which is why it has to be settled early.