Skip to content
Request a quote

Responsibility between disciplines

A penetration through the structure: the mechanical engineer wants it, the structural engineer allows it — but who draws it and who checks it?

On a smaller project the architect, on a larger one the building-element designer. Fire and energy compliance, though, belong to other disciplines — and the build-up touches all three.

The weight of a plant item, the load on a balcony, a photovoltaic array: these are data somebody has to give the structural engineer.

Several disciplines run in the same layer — somebody has to decide the order.

They are produced from the detailed design but matched to the manufacturing technology. The boundary has to be defined precisely. Shop drawings.

Because it differs from project to project. An experienced team develops a routine, but as soon as a new participant joins — or a discipline is external — the assumption becomes a mistake.

Responsibility is also a legal question: a designer is liable for their own design, and the boundary between disciplines also determines how far that extends. Designer liability.

At the start of the appointment, in writing:

  1. Which discipline designs what — item by item, not in general terms.
  2. Who supplies which data to whom, and when.
  3. Who coordinates, and with what decision-making authority.
  4. What is produced at which stage, and what the approval route is.
  5. Who checks consistency, and with what tool.
  6. What happens on a change: who notifies whom.

Most trouble is not in the original design but in the change: somebody changes something and the other disciplines do not hear about it.

So the change control arrangement is at least as important as the original division of work.

“I thought you were doing that” — the sentence behind most design mistakes. Writing the boundaries down takes half an hour; repairing the consequences takes weeks.