Skip to content
Request a quote

What light gauge steel is really good for

The first argument: the wall is half as thick

Section titled “The first argument: the wall is half as thick”

It delivers the same thermal and acoustic performance from roughly half the wall thickness of traditional construction. The exact ratio depends on the build-up, but that is the order of magnitude.

This is not an aesthetic detail. On a plot with a fixed permitted footprint, wall thickness is usable floor area directly: several square metres per flat in an apartment building, a whole room’s worth in a house. Comparing wall thicknesses.

The second argument: a more durable structure

Section titled “The second argument: a more durable structure”

Not “also good” but better than most alternatives:

  • it does not take up moisture, so it does not swell, warp or crack the finishes,
  • it is made to machine accuracy, to the same quality in series,
  • it does not rot and insects do not eat it,
  • its build-up can be tuned freely to the real requirements, rather than being dictated by the masonry material.

On the material cost of the structure, 40% can be saved with an optimised design compared with an over-sized one. With precise build-ups the material cost can be lower than a brick-plus-insulation solution too.

That is still not why to choose it. Anyone who looks only at the price list will buy the cheapest build-up — and lose exactly the quality the technology is good for.

Site work is short and less weather-dependent. A real advantage, but not the decisive one: the design takes correspondingly longer, because every decision has to be made before manufacture here.

No competition here: the reserve capacity of the existing structure is tight, and the low self-weight decides it. Rooftop additions.

The design is produced once and manufacture multiplies it accurately. A hotel, a hall of residence, a terrace: this is where prefabrication really pays back.

Little storage, a small crane, dry technology. On an inner-city infill plot that is often not an advantage but a condition.

A fixed permitted footprint, expensive square metres.

Because of machine cutting, a complicated shape costs no more — it only takes more design work. Trusses.

All of this holds when it is designed. This technology gives more for good design than traditional construction — and forgives less bad design. It has no reserve from mass to hide a mistake.

Use of space and durability: those are the two arguments. Anyone promising speed and cheapness first is not selling this technology but the appearance of it.