Skip to content
Request a quote

The effective cross-section

Stress distribution in a plate element after buckling, and the resulting effective cross-section: full value near the edges, the middle dropping out.

A – real stress distribution, B – the substitute effective widths. 1 supported edge · 2 stress falling away in the middle · 3 the effective part · 4 what drops out of the calculation

After buckling the stress distribution across the plate element is uneven: high near the supported edges, low in the middle.

Design simplifies this: it says that only an effective width of the element works, and it works at full stress — the rest does not count.

The effective cross-section is the reduced cross-section determined this way.

Two sections with the same amount of material can differ greatly in capacity, depending on how “effective” the geometry is.

The effective part depends on the action too

Section titled “The effective part depends on the action too”

A compressed member is a different case from a bent one: in bending one half of the cross-section is compressed and the other in tension, and the tension part does not buckle. So the effective cross-section depends on the action.

If part of the cross-section drops out, the centroid of the remainder moves. This produces secondary effects — additional bending in a compressed member, for example — which design accounts for.

Because determining the effective cross-section is iterative: the stress distribution gives the effective part, that gives a new stress distribution, and so on. This is why the calculation is done in software, following the expressions in the standard.

That does not mean the designer need not understand it: they have to see what influences the result, so they can steer the structure in the right direction.

  • Lips and stiffeners: they increase the effective part directly.
  • Accurate geometry: deviation in the produced section changes the effective cross-section. In-process quality control.
  • Restraint: besides improving global stability, it affects the behaviour of the local elements.

Where calculation is too conservative or the geometry is complex, the standard allows design by testing. Design by testing.

Because of the effective cross-section, “how much steel is in it” says nothing about capacity. The shape counts at least as much as the quantity.