Skip to content
Request a quote

The design programme

Design is not a set of parallel tasks: there are steps that can only start when the previous one is done.

The typical chain:

  1. Site data and design brief → without them there is no meaningful concept.
  2. Architectural concept → the structure and the services start from it.
  3. Structural concept and spans → they bound the service routes.
  4. Services concept → it gives the structural penetrations and the demands on the build-up.
  5. Finalising the build-ups → this needs the fire and energy requirements.
  6. Detailed design in every discipline.
  7. Shop drawings.

If any step is incomplete, the next either stops or is built on an assumption.

The designer asks and gets no answer. The most common cause, and the one least within the designer’s control.

Ground investigation, utility data, survey. Obtaining these takes lead time.

Amending a stage already closed affects several disciplines.

Permitting, specialist authority input.

The designer should flag in advance when a decision will be needed and what it is. That gives the client time.

Ground investigation, utility data: they can be started in the first week and take weeks.

A stage has to be closed before the next starts. The “it’ll sort itself out as we go” attitude is particularly expensive with a prefabricated structure.

Leave time for the last check before manufacture.

A design cannot be sped up indefinitely, because the steps build on one another. What can be sped up is the decision time and the data gathering — in other words the client’s side.

The programme is an order of dependencies, not a list of deadlines. Delay generally arises where the design is waiting for something.