Skip to content
Request a quote

Why it is not drywall profile

The two profiles look alike: both are C and U shapes bent from galvanised steel sheet, both are fixed with screws, both can take plasterboard. Anyone looking only at a photograph is right to think they are the same thing.

The difference is in the thickness — and it is not a small one.

  • Drywall profile: around 0.4–0.6 mm.
  • Structural thin-walled profile: starts at 0.8 mm, typically runs to 1.6 mm in houses, and further in larger structures.

That is three to four times the thickness — and because stability governs in thin-walled structures, the difference in capacity is greater still.

Thinner sheet buckles much sooner. Drywall profile was never made to carry load: it carries the weight of the partition and its lining, not a floor and a roof.

Thicker sheet gives far higher screw capacity, because failure occurs in the sheet. In thin sheet the screw simply tears out.

The structural profile is made with lips, often with web stiffening, and its dimensional accuracy is checked more strictly.

The structural profile comes with a declaration of performance that also declares the structural characteristics. That is what allows it to be used in calculations. What CE marking certifies.

You cannot build a load-bearing structure from drywall profile. This is not a cost question but a structural one.

The load-bearing frame is made from structural profile, while non-load-bearing partitions may be made from drywall profile. The drawings have to distinguish them clearly.

The “lightweight house equals plasterboard box” prejudice largely comes from here. The internal surface being plasterboard does not make the structure plasterboard — just as a rendered masonry wall is masonry, not render.

Behind the similar shape sits three to four times the thickness and a completely different structural role. Clear this up first when someone talks about a “plasterboard house”.