Skip to content
Request a quote

Residential buildings

The most common application. Here the advantages of the technology are felt directly:

  • thinner walls, more usable floor area,
  • fast, dry construction,
  • an accurate, dimensionally stable structure,
  • a freely tunable build-up.

The typical questions — “will it sound hollow?”, “what can I hang on the wall?” — are all build-up and design questions. Building physics and build-ups.

This is where the acoustic requirement on separating elements enters, and where the technology becomes genuinely valuable:

  • the party wall gives the same result at roughly half the thickness of brick, Party walls,
  • a massive floor build-up is recommended, Floor build-ups,
  • the fire requirement is stricter, so the build-up has to suit it.

The wall thickness saved can be several square metres per flat.

Because of the repetition the design is produced once and manufacture multiplies it accurately. Party wall acoustics is a central question here too.

The usual manufacturing plant gives solutions for 1–4 storey structures; machines handling thicker material also serve medium-rise buildings. The machine range.

The actual limit comes from the structural design, the bracing and the anchorage, not from the technology in itself.

What to think through specifically for housing

Section titled “What to think through specifically for housing”

Not only between dwellings: between bedroom and corridor, bathroom and living room too. That is a build-up decision, and it belongs in the design brief.

Vibration is the most common complaint afterwards — and the easiest to prevent.

The depth of the service cavity should suit the diameter of the pipework. Service cavity.

In housing the advantages of the technology show up in daily use: more space, better sound insulation, a stable structure. But they depend on the build-up, not on the frame.