Skip to content
Request a quote

Seismic design in the Hungarian context

An earthquake arises from movement of the ground, and the force on the structure comes from inertia: the greater the mass, the greater the force.

Hence one of the natural advantages of light gauge steel construction: in the same situation a substantially smaller seismic force arises than in a masonry or in-situ building.

The smaller force does not mean the question can be ignored:

  • the structure has to move together — bracing and continuity of the load path are conditions here too,
  • the fixing of the non-structural elements — heavy finishes, plant, partitions — is a separate question,
  • an irregular plan or mass distribution causes unfavourable behaviour regardless of weight.

A symmetrical, evenly braced plan behaves better than one prone to twisting and braced on one side.

Stiffness changing abruptly from storey to storey — an open ground floor beneath closed upper storeys, say — concentrates the forces.

The same requirement as for wind load. Load path continuity.

A screwed connection can take large deformation before failing, which is a favourable property in an earthquake.

Hungary is not among the highest seismic risk areas, but it is not free of it either: the zone map in the national annex gives the base value for a given location.

In practice that means that for many ordinary dwellings the wind is the governing horizontal action, not the earthquake — but that has to be checked, not assumed.

In an earthquake a significant share of the damage comes not from the structure but from finishes falling and equipment overturning. Fixing these is part of the design, in public buildings especially.

A light structure has a natural advantage here, but the advantage only materialises if the structure moves as one: with bracing and a continuous load path.