Basis of design: EN 1990
Handling uncertainty
Section titled “Handling uncertainty”Nothing in the design of a structure is known exactly: not the actions, not the strength of the material, not the geometry, not the accuracy of the model.
EN 1990 gives a system for this: it does not calculate with “certain” values but with characteristic values and partial factors, which handle the uncertainty separately on each side.
- The action is increased by a factor.
- The resistance is reduced by another.
- The two are compared.
The limit states
Section titled “The limit states”Ultimate limit state
Section titled “Ultimate limit state”The state whose occurrence means collapse or a similarly serious event. The safety margin is large here, because the consequence is severe.
It covers strength, stability, overturning, sliding and failure of the connections.
Serviceability limit state
Section titled “Serviceability limit state”The state that threatens normal use, the appearance of the structure or the integrity of the finishes: excessive deflection, vibration, cracking.
The factors are milder here, because the consequence is less serious — but in a thin-walled structure this is often the stricter condition. Serviceability criteria.
Load combinations
Section titled “Load combinations”Actions do not reach their maxima at the same time: it is improbable that record snow, record wind and a house full of people will coincide.
So the standard works with combination factors: one action appears at its maximum, the others at a reduced value. Several combinations have to be examined and the governing one taken. Partial factors and load combinations.
The reliability level
Section titled “The reliability level”The standard scales safety to the severity of the consequences: a hospital or a building holding many people is designed to a higher reliability level than an agricultural building.
The design working life
Section titled “The design working life”Every structure is assigned a design working life, and the actions and durability requirements follow from it. Design working life.
Why this is worth understanding as a non-engineer
Section titled “Why this is worth understanding as a non-engineer”Because it shows that a structure does not carry everything but carries specified actions, chosen on a probabilistic basis, with a given safety margin. That is what makes it intelligible why it matters what goes on the floor, and why the designer has to be asked before an alteration.
The point
Section titled “The point”EN 1990 is the grammar of structural design. Understand it and the other standards are only vocabulary.