Skip to content
Request a quote

Steel and timber framing

Both are framed technologies: a relatively sparse load-bearing frame, insulation between the members, linings inside and out. The logic of the build-up, vapour control, the service cavity and acoustics are similar too.

So much of the building physics described in this knowledge base applies to both.

It does not take up moisture, does not swell, warp or shrink. Dimensional stability.

Steel does not contribute to the fire. Even so the structure’s fire resistance has to be verified, because the thin section heats up quickly.

Machine production gives millimetre accuracy and identical quality in series.

It does not rot, insects do not eat it, and the material itself does not go mouldy.

Steel is recyclable to a high degree, and the structure is screwed, therefore demountable.

Timber conducts heat orders of magnitude worse, so the thermal bridge from the frame is far smaller. With steel this has to be compensated by detailing. Thermal bridging in steel.

The origin of the material and the embodied carbon question favour timber, if the source is sustainable.

On a smaller project, with a simpler tool set, shaping timber on site is easier.

Where the difference is to be managed, not claimed as an advantage

Section titled “Where the difference is to be managed, not claimed as an advantage”

Steel does not burn but loses strength when hot. Timber burns but the charring layer protects its core, and its design accounts for this. Both have to be calculated for fire — just by different logic.

Timber is damaged when wet, steel corrodes. For both, the answer is a dry structure, not the choice of material.

It depends on the project: span, number of storeys, fire requirements, manufacturing background, local labour and client preference all play a part. Vertical extensions and structures needing high accuracy in series are typically steel’s ground.

The question is not which material is better, but whose weakness we can manage better on this project. Both technologies are good designed well and bad designed badly.